arm-trusted-firmware/plat/arm/board/fvp/fconf/fconf_hw_config_getter.c

175 lines
4.9 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2020, Arm Limited. All rights reserved.
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*/
#include <assert.h>
#include <common/debug.h>
#include <common/fdt_wrappers.h>
#include <fconf_hw_config_getter.h>
#include <libfdt.h>
#include <plat/common/platform.h>
struct gicv3_config_t gicv3_config;
struct hw_topology_t soc_topology;
int fconf_populate_gicv3_config(uintptr_t config)
{
int err;
int node;
uintptr_t addr;
/* Necessary to work with libfdt APIs */
const void *hw_config_dtb = (const void *)config;
/*
* Find the offset of the node containing "arm,gic-v3" compatible property.
* Populating fconf strucutures dynamically is not supported for legacy
* systems which use GICv2 IP. Simply skip extracting GIC properties.
*/
node = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(hw_config_dtb, -1, "arm,gic-v3");
if (node < 0) {
WARN("FCONF: Unable to locate node with arm,gic-v3 compatible property\n");
return 0;
}
/* The GICv3 DT binding holds at least two address/size pairs,
* the first describing the distributor, the second the redistributors.
* See: bindings/interrupt-controller/arm,gic-v3.yaml
*/
err = fdt_get_reg_props_by_index(hw_config_dtb, node, 0, &addr, NULL);
if (err < 0) {
ERROR("FCONF: Failed to read GICD reg property of GIC node\n");
return err;
}
gicv3_config.gicd_base = addr;
err = fdt_get_reg_props_by_index(hw_config_dtb, node, 1, &addr, NULL);
if (err < 0) {
ERROR("FCONF: Failed to read GICR reg property of GIC node\n");
} else {
gicv3_config.gicr_base = addr;
}
return err;
}
int fconf_populate_topology(uintptr_t config)
{
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
int err, node, cluster_node, core_node, thread_node;
uint32_t cluster_count = 0, max_cpu_per_cluster = 0, total_cpu_count = 0;
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
uint32_t max_pwr_lvl = 0;
/* Necessary to work with libfdt APIs */
const void *hw_config_dtb = (const void *)config;
/* Find the offset of the node containing "arm,psci-1.0" compatible property */
node = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(hw_config_dtb, -1, "arm,psci-1.0");
if (node < 0) {
ERROR("FCONF: Unable to locate node with arm,psci-1.0 compatible property\n");
return node;
}
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
err = fdt_read_uint32(hw_config_dtb, node, "max-pwr-lvl", &max_pwr_lvl);
if (err < 0) {
/*
* Some legacy FVP dts may not have this property. Assign the default
* value.
*/
WARN("FCONF: Could not locate max-pwr-lvl property\n");
max_pwr_lvl = 2;
}
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
assert(max_pwr_lvl <= MPIDR_AFFLVL2);
/* Find the offset of the "cpus" node */
node = fdt_path_offset(hw_config_dtb, "/cpus");
if (node < 0) {
ERROR("FCONF: Node '%s' not found in hardware configuration dtb\n", "cpus");
return node;
}
/* A typical cpu-map node in a device tree is shown here for reference
cpu-map {
cluster0 {
core0 {
cpu = <&CPU0>;
};
core1 {
cpu = <&CPU1>;
};
};
cluster1 {
core0 {
cpu = <&CPU2>;
};
core1 {
cpu = <&CPU3>;
};
};
};
*/
/* Locate the cpu-map child node */
node = fdt_subnode_offset(hw_config_dtb, node, "cpu-map");
if (node < 0) {
ERROR("FCONF: Node '%s' not found in hardware configuration dtb\n", "cpu-map");
return node;
}
uint32_t cpus_per_cluster[PLAT_ARM_CLUSTER_COUNT] = {0};
/* Iterate through cluster nodes */
fdt_for_each_subnode(cluster_node, hw_config_dtb, node) {
assert(cluster_count < PLAT_ARM_CLUSTER_COUNT);
/* Iterate through core nodes */
fdt_for_each_subnode(core_node, hw_config_dtb, cluster_node) {
/* core nodes may have child nodes i.e., "thread" nodes */
if (fdt_first_subnode(hw_config_dtb, core_node) < 0) {
cpus_per_cluster[cluster_count]++;
} else {
/* Multi-threaded CPU description is found in dtb */
fdt_for_each_subnode(thread_node, hw_config_dtb, core_node) {
cpus_per_cluster[cluster_count]++;
}
/* Since in some dtbs, core nodes may not have thread node,
* no need to error if even one child node is not found.
*/
}
}
/* Ensure every cluster node has at least 1 child node */
if (cpus_per_cluster[cluster_count] < 1U) {
ERROR("FCONF: Unable to locate the core node in cluster %d\n", cluster_count);
return -1;
}
INFO("CLUSTER ID: %d cpu-count: %d\n", cluster_count, cpus_per_cluster[cluster_count]);
/* Find the maximum number of cpus in any cluster */
max_cpu_per_cluster = MAX(max_cpu_per_cluster, cpus_per_cluster[cluster_count]);
total_cpu_count += cpus_per_cluster[cluster_count];
cluster_count++;
}
/* At least one cluster node is expected in hardware configuration dtb */
if (cluster_count < 1U) {
ERROR("FCONF: Unable to locate the cluster node in cpu-map node\n");
return -1;
}
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
soc_topology.plat_max_pwr_level = max_pwr_lvl;
soc_topology.plat_cluster_count = cluster_count;
soc_topology.cluster_cpu_count = max_cpu_per_cluster;
soc_topology.plat_cpu_count = total_cpu_count;
return 0;
}
FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR(HW_CONFIG, gicv3_config, fconf_populate_gicv3_config);
FCONF_REGISTER_POPULATOR(HW_CONFIG, topology, fconf_populate_topology);