arm-trusted-firmware/plat/common/plat_spmd_manifest.c

127 lines
3.5 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* Copyright (c) 2020, Arm Limited. All rights reserved.
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
*/
#include <assert.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <libfdt.h>
#include <common/debug.h>
#include <common/fdt_wrappers.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <platform_def.h>
#include <services/spm_core_manifest.h>
/*******************************************************************************
* Attribute section handler
******************************************************************************/
static int manifest_parse_attribute(spmc_manifest_sect_attribute_t *attr,
const void *fdt,
int node)
{
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
uint32_t val32;
int rc = 0;
assert(attr && fdt);
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint32(fdt, node, "maj_ver", &attr->major_version);
if (rc) {
ERROR("Missing SPCI major version in SPM core manifest.\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint32(fdt, node, "min_ver", &attr->minor_version);
if (rc) {
ERROR("Missing SPCI minor version in SPM core manifest.\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint32(fdt, node, "spmc_id", &val32);
if (rc) {
ERROR("Missing SPMC ID in manifest.\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
attr->spmc_id = val32;
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint32(fdt, node, "exec_state", &attr->exec_state);
if (rc)
NOTICE("Execution state not specified in SPM core manifest.\n");
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint32(fdt, node, "binary_size", &attr->binary_size);
if (rc)
NOTICE("Binary size not specified in SPM core manifest.\n");
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint64(fdt, node, "load_address", &attr->load_address);
if (rc)
NOTICE("Load address not specified in SPM core manifest.\n");
fdt/wrappers: Replace fdtw_read_cells() implementation Our fdtw_read_cells() implementation goes to great lengths to sanity-check every parameter and result, but leaves a big hole open: The size of the storage the value pointer points at needs to match the number of cells given. This can't be easily checked at compile time, since we lose the size information by using a void pointer. Regardless the current usage of this function is somewhat wrong anyways, since we use it on single-element, fixed-length properties only, for which the DT binding specifies the size. Typically we use those functions dealing with a number of cells in DT context to deal with *dynamically* sized properties, which depend on other properties (#size-cells, #clock-cells, ...), to specify the number of cells needed. Another problem with the current implementation is the use of ambiguously sized types (uintptr_t, size_t) together with a certain expectation about their size. In general there is no relation between the length of a DT property and the bitness of the code that parses the DTB: AArch64 code could encounter 32-bit addresses (where the physical address space is limited to 4GB [1]), while AArch32 code could read 64-bit sized properties (/memory nodes on LPAE systems, [2]). To make this more clear, fix the potential issues and also align more with other DT users (Linux and U-Boot), introduce functions to explicitly read uint32 and uint64 properties. As the other DT consumers, we do this based on the generic "read array" function. Convert all users to use either of those two new functions, and make sure we never use a pointer to anything other than uint32_t or uint64_t variables directly. This reveals (and fixes) a bug in plat_spmd_manifest.c, where we write 4 bytes into a uint16_t variable (passed via a void pointer). Also we change the implementation of the function to better align with other libfdt users, by using the right types (fdt32_t) and common variable names (*prop, prop_names). [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a64.dtsi#n874 [2] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/arm/boot/dts/ecx-2000.dts Change-Id: I718de960515117ac7a3331a1b177d2ec224a3890 Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
2020-03-26 11:22:37 +00:00
rc = fdt_read_uint64(fdt, node, "entrypoint", &attr->entrypoint);
if (rc)
NOTICE("Entrypoint not specified in SPM core manifest.\n");
VERBOSE("SPM core manifest attribute section:\n");
VERBOSE(" version: %x.%x\n", attr->major_version, attr->minor_version);
VERBOSE(" spmc_id: %x\n", attr->spmc_id);
VERBOSE(" binary_size: 0x%x\n", attr->binary_size);
VERBOSE(" load_address: 0x%llx\n", attr->load_address);
VERBOSE(" entrypoint: 0x%llx\n", attr->entrypoint);
return 0;
}
/*******************************************************************************
* Root node handler
******************************************************************************/
static int manifest_parse_root(spmc_manifest_sect_attribute_t *manifest,
const void *fdt,
int root)
{
int node;
char *str;
str = "attribute";
node = fdt_subnode_offset_namelen(fdt, root, str, strlen(str));
if (node < 0) {
ERROR("Root node doesn't contain subnode '%s'\n", str);
return -ENOENT;
}
return manifest_parse_attribute(manifest, fdt, node);
}
/*******************************************************************************
* Platform handler to parse a SPM core manifest.
******************************************************************************/
int plat_spm_core_manifest_load(spmc_manifest_sect_attribute_t *manifest,
const void *ptr,
size_t size)
{
int rc;
int root_node;
assert(manifest != NULL);
assert(ptr != NULL);
INFO("Reading SPM core manifest at address %p\n", ptr);
rc = fdt_check_header(ptr);
if (rc != 0) {
ERROR("Wrong format for SPM core manifest (%d).\n", rc);
return -EINVAL;
}
INFO("Reading SPM core manifest at address %p\n", ptr);
root_node = fdt_node_offset_by_compatible(ptr, -1,
"arm,spci-core-manifest-1.0");
if (root_node < 0) {
ERROR("Unrecognized SPM core manifest\n");
return -ENOENT;
}
INFO("Reading SPM core manifest at address %p\n", ptr);
return manifest_parse_root(manifest, ptr, root_node);
}