From 3b78c8766c2d92acc04d78ed39302eda79b14bee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Volker Lanz Date: Tue, 18 May 2010 22:52:25 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] It would not make sense to use CoreBackendDevice instead of Device in CoreBackendPartitionTable::detectFileSystemBySector(), though it would be possible. But all other methos use Partition, not CoreBackendPartition, so it would not be consistent. Nothing gained. svn path=/trunk/extragear/sysadmin/partitionmanager/; revision=1128324 --- TODO | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/TODO b/TODO index eeeb7a3..36c9f6f 100644 --- a/TODO +++ b/TODO @@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ Bugs to fix for 1.1: if the new one is not legal. i.e., we must constantly update the valid ranges of the spin boxes if any value changes. -* why does CoreBackendPartitionTable::detectFileSystemBySector() take a Device - and not a CoreBackendDevice? - =============================================================================== For releases after 1.1: