It would not make sense to use CoreBackendDevice instead of Device in
CoreBackendPartitionTable::detectFileSystemBySector(), though it would be possible. But all other methos use Partition, not CoreBackendPartition, so it would not be consistent. Nothing gained. svn path=/trunk/extragear/sysadmin/partitionmanager/; revision=1128324
This commit is contained in:
parent
faa406a201
commit
3b78c8766c
3
TODO
3
TODO
|
@ -9,9 +9,6 @@ Bugs to fix for 1.1:
|
|||
if the new one is not legal. i.e., we must constantly update the valid ranges
|
||||
of the spin boxes if any value changes.
|
||||
|
||||
* why does CoreBackendPartitionTable::detectFileSystemBySector() take a Device
|
||||
and not a CoreBackendDevice?
|
||||
|
||||
===============================================================================
|
||||
|
||||
For releases after 1.1:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue