arm-trusted-firmware/lib/psci/psci_private.h

280 lines
10 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/*
* Copyright (c) 2013-2018, ARM Limited and Contributors. All rights reserved.
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
*
* SPDX-License-Identifier: BSD-3-Clause
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
*/
#ifndef __PSCI_PRIVATE_H__
#define __PSCI_PRIVATE_H__
#include <arch.h>
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
#include <bakery_lock.h>
#include <bl_common.h>
#include <cpu_data.h>
#include <psci.h>
#include <spinlock.h>
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
#if HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
/*
* On systems with hardware-assisted coherency, make PSCI cache operations NOP,
* as PSCI participants are cache-coherent, and there's no need for explicit
* cache maintenance operations or barriers to coordinate their state.
*/
#define psci_flush_dcache_range(addr, size)
#define psci_flush_cpu_data(member)
#define psci_inv_cpu_data(member)
#define psci_dsbish()
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
/*
* On systems where participant CPUs are cache-coherent, we can use spinlocks
* instead of bakery locks.
*/
#define DEFINE_PSCI_LOCK(_name) spinlock_t _name
#define DECLARE_PSCI_LOCK(_name) extern DEFINE_PSCI_LOCK(_name)
#define psci_lock_get(non_cpu_pd_node) \
spin_lock(&psci_locks[(non_cpu_pd_node)->lock_index])
#define psci_lock_release(non_cpu_pd_node) \
spin_unlock(&psci_locks[(non_cpu_pd_node)->lock_index])
#else
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
/*
* If not all PSCI participants are cache-coherent, perform cache maintenance
* and issue barriers wherever required to coordinate state.
*/
#define psci_flush_dcache_range(addr, size) flush_dcache_range(addr, size)
#define psci_flush_cpu_data(member) flush_cpu_data(member)
#define psci_inv_cpu_data(member) inv_cpu_data(member)
#define psci_dsbish() dsbish()
/*
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
* Use bakery locks for state coordination as not all PSCI participants are
* cache coherent.
*/
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
#define DEFINE_PSCI_LOCK(_name) DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK(_name)
#define DECLARE_PSCI_LOCK(_name) DECLARE_BAKERY_LOCK(_name)
#define psci_lock_get(non_cpu_pd_node) \
Re-design bakery lock memory allocation and algorithm This patch unifies the bakery lock api's across coherent and normal memory implementation of locks by using same data type `bakery_lock_t` and similar arguments to functions. A separate section `bakery_lock` has been created and used to allocate memory for bakery locks using `DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`. When locks are allocated in normal memory, each lock for a core has to spread across multiple cache lines. By using the total size allocated in a separate cache line for a single core at compile time, the memory for other core locks is allocated at link time by multiplying the single core locks size with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). The normal memory lock algorithm now uses lock address instead of the `id` in the per_cpu_data. For locks allocated in coherent memory, it moves locks from tzfw_coherent_memory to bakery_lock section. The bakery locks are allocated as part of bss or in coherent memory depending on usage of coherent memory. Both these regions are initialised to zero as part of run_time_init before locks are used. Hence, bakery_lock_init() is made an empty function as the lock memory is already initialised to zero. The above design lead to the removal of psci bakery locks from non_cpu_power_pd_node to psci_locks. NOTE: THE BAKERY LOCK API WHEN USE_COHERENT_MEM IS NOT SET HAS CHANGED. THIS IS A BREAKING CHANGE FOR ALL PLATFORM PORTS THAT ALLOCATE BAKERY LOCKS IN NORMAL MEMORY. Change-Id: Ic3751c0066b8032dcbf9d88f1d4dc73d15f61d8b
2015-09-10 11:39:36 +01:00
bakery_lock_get(&psci_locks[(non_cpu_pd_node)->lock_index])
#define psci_lock_release(non_cpu_pd_node) \
Re-design bakery lock memory allocation and algorithm This patch unifies the bakery lock api's across coherent and normal memory implementation of locks by using same data type `bakery_lock_t` and similar arguments to functions. A separate section `bakery_lock` has been created and used to allocate memory for bakery locks using `DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`. When locks are allocated in normal memory, each lock for a core has to spread across multiple cache lines. By using the total size allocated in a separate cache line for a single core at compile time, the memory for other core locks is allocated at link time by multiplying the single core locks size with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). The normal memory lock algorithm now uses lock address instead of the `id` in the per_cpu_data. For locks allocated in coherent memory, it moves locks from tzfw_coherent_memory to bakery_lock section. The bakery locks are allocated as part of bss or in coherent memory depending on usage of coherent memory. Both these regions are initialised to zero as part of run_time_init before locks are used. Hence, bakery_lock_init() is made an empty function as the lock memory is already initialised to zero. The above design lead to the removal of psci bakery locks from non_cpu_power_pd_node to psci_locks. NOTE: THE BAKERY LOCK API WHEN USE_COHERENT_MEM IS NOT SET HAS CHANGED. THIS IS A BREAKING CHANGE FOR ALL PLATFORM PORTS THAT ALLOCATE BAKERY LOCKS IN NORMAL MEMORY. Change-Id: Ic3751c0066b8032dcbf9d88f1d4dc73d15f61d8b
2015-09-10 11:39:36 +01:00
bakery_lock_release(&psci_locks[(non_cpu_pd_node)->lock_index])
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
#endif
#define psci_lock_init(non_cpu_pd_node, idx) \
((non_cpu_pd_node)[(idx)].lock_index = (idx))
/*
* The PSCI capability which are provided by the generic code but does not
* depend on the platform or spd capabilities.
*/
#define PSCI_GENERIC_CAP \
(define_psci_cap(PSCI_VERSION) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_AFFINITY_INFO_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_FEATURES))
/*
* The PSCI capabilities mask for 64 bit functions.
*/
#define PSCI_CAP_64BIT_MASK \
(define_psci_cap(PSCI_CPU_SUSPEND_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_CPU_ON_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_AFFINITY_INFO_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_MIG_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_MIG_INFO_UP_CPU_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_NODE_HW_STATE_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_SYSTEM_SUSPEND_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_STAT_RESIDENCY_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_STAT_COUNT_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_SYSTEM_RESET2_AARCH64) | \
define_psci_cap(PSCI_MEM_CHK_RANGE_AARCH64))
/*
* Helper macros to get/set the fields of PSCI per-cpu data.
*/
#define psci_set_aff_info_state(aff_state) \
set_cpu_data(psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state, aff_state)
#define psci_get_aff_info_state() \
get_cpu_data(psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state)
#define psci_get_aff_info_state_by_idx(idx) \
get_cpu_data_by_index(idx, psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state)
#define psci_set_aff_info_state_by_idx(idx, aff_state) \
set_cpu_data_by_index(idx, psci_svc_cpu_data.aff_info_state,\
aff_state)
#define psci_get_suspend_pwrlvl() \
get_cpu_data(psci_svc_cpu_data.target_pwrlvl)
#define psci_set_suspend_pwrlvl(target_lvl) \
set_cpu_data(psci_svc_cpu_data.target_pwrlvl, target_lvl)
#define psci_set_cpu_local_state(state) \
set_cpu_data(psci_svc_cpu_data.local_state, state)
#define psci_get_cpu_local_state() \
get_cpu_data(psci_svc_cpu_data.local_state)
#define psci_get_cpu_local_state_by_idx(idx) \
get_cpu_data_by_index(idx, psci_svc_cpu_data.local_state)
/*
* Helper macros for the CPU level spinlocks
*/
#define psci_spin_lock_cpu(idx) spin_lock(&psci_cpu_pd_nodes[idx].cpu_lock)
#define psci_spin_unlock_cpu(idx) spin_unlock(&psci_cpu_pd_nodes[idx].cpu_lock)
/* Helper macro to identify a CPU standby request in PSCI Suspend call */
#define is_cpu_standby_req(is_power_down_state, retn_lvl) \
(((!(is_power_down_state)) && ((retn_lvl) == 0)) ? 1 : 0)
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/*******************************************************************************
* The following two data structures implement the power domain tree. The tree
* is used to track the state of all the nodes i.e. power domain instances
* described by the platform. The tree consists of nodes that describe CPU power
* domains i.e. leaf nodes and all other power domains which are parents of a
* CPU power domain i.e. non-leaf nodes.
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
******************************************************************************/
typedef struct non_cpu_pwr_domain_node {
/*
* Index of the first CPU power domain node level 0 which has this node
* as its parent.
*/
unsigned int cpu_start_idx;
/*
* Number of CPU power domains which are siblings of the domain indexed
* by 'cpu_start_idx' i.e. all the domains in the range 'cpu_start_idx
* -> cpu_start_idx + ncpus' have this node as their parent.
*/
unsigned int ncpus;
/*
* Index of the parent power domain node.
* TODO: Figure out whether to whether using pointer is more efficient.
*/
unsigned int parent_node;
plat_local_state_t local_state;
psci: fix affinity level upgrade issue The psci implementation does not track target affinity level requests specified during cpu_suspend calls correctly as per the following example. 1. cpu0.cluster0 calls cpu_suspend with the target affinity level as 0 2. Only the cpu0.cluster0 is powered down while cluster0 remains powered up 3. cpu1.cluster0 calls cpu_off to power itself down to highest possible affinity level 4. cluster0 will be powered off even though cpu0.cluster0 does not allow cluster shutdown This patch introduces reference counts at affinity levels > 0 to track the number of cpus which want an affinity instance at level X to remain powered up. This instance can be turned off only if its reference count is 0. Cpus still undergo the normal state transitions (ON, OFF, ON_PENDING, SUSPEND) but the higher levels can only be either ON or OFF depending upon their reference count. The above issue is thus fixed as follows: 1. cluster0's reference count is incremented by two when cpu0 and cpu1 are initially powered on. 2. cpu0.cluster0 calls cpu_suspend with the target affinity level as 0. This does not affect the cluster0 reference count. 3. Only the cpu0.cluster0 is powered down while cluster0 remains powered up as it has a non-zero reference count. 4. cpu1.cluster0 call cpu_off to power itself down to highest possible affinity level. This decrements the cluster0 reference count. 5. cluster0 is still not powered off since its reference count will at least be 1 due to the restriction placed by cpu0. Change-Id: I433dfe82b946f5f6985b1602c2de87800504f7a9
2013-12-05 16:33:10 +00:00
unsigned char level;
Re-design bakery lock memory allocation and algorithm This patch unifies the bakery lock api's across coherent and normal memory implementation of locks by using same data type `bakery_lock_t` and similar arguments to functions. A separate section `bakery_lock` has been created and used to allocate memory for bakery locks using `DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`. When locks are allocated in normal memory, each lock for a core has to spread across multiple cache lines. By using the total size allocated in a separate cache line for a single core at compile time, the memory for other core locks is allocated at link time by multiplying the single core locks size with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). The normal memory lock algorithm now uses lock address instead of the `id` in the per_cpu_data. For locks allocated in coherent memory, it moves locks from tzfw_coherent_memory to bakery_lock section. The bakery locks are allocated as part of bss or in coherent memory depending on usage of coherent memory. Both these regions are initialised to zero as part of run_time_init before locks are used. Hence, bakery_lock_init() is made an empty function as the lock memory is already initialised to zero. The above design lead to the removal of psci bakery locks from non_cpu_power_pd_node to psci_locks. NOTE: THE BAKERY LOCK API WHEN USE_COHERENT_MEM IS NOT SET HAS CHANGED. THIS IS A BREAKING CHANGE FOR ALL PLATFORM PORTS THAT ALLOCATE BAKERY LOCKS IN NORMAL MEMORY. Change-Id: Ic3751c0066b8032dcbf9d88f1d4dc73d15f61d8b
2015-09-10 11:39:36 +01:00
/* For indexing the psci_lock array*/
unsigned char lock_index;
} non_cpu_pd_node_t;
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
typedef struct cpu_pwr_domain_node {
u_register_t mpidr;
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/*
* Index of the parent power domain node.
* TODO: Figure out whether to whether using pointer is more efficient.
*/
unsigned int parent_node;
/*
* A CPU power domain does not require state coordination like its
* parent power domains. Hence this node does not include a bakery
* lock. A spinlock is required by the CPU_ON handler to prevent a race
* when multiple CPUs try to turn ON the same target CPU.
*/
spinlock_t cpu_lock;
} cpu_pd_node_t;
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/*******************************************************************************
* Data prototypes
******************************************************************************/
extern const plat_psci_ops_t *psci_plat_pm_ops;
extern non_cpu_pd_node_t psci_non_cpu_pd_nodes[PSCI_NUM_NON_CPU_PWR_DOMAINS];
extern cpu_pd_node_t psci_cpu_pd_nodes[PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT];
extern unsigned int psci_caps;
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
/* One lock is required per non-CPU power domain node */
DECLARE_PSCI_LOCK(psci_locks[PSCI_NUM_NON_CPU_PWR_DOMAINS]);
Re-design bakery lock memory allocation and algorithm This patch unifies the bakery lock api's across coherent and normal memory implementation of locks by using same data type `bakery_lock_t` and similar arguments to functions. A separate section `bakery_lock` has been created and used to allocate memory for bakery locks using `DEFINE_BAKERY_LOCK`. When locks are allocated in normal memory, each lock for a core has to spread across multiple cache lines. By using the total size allocated in a separate cache line for a single core at compile time, the memory for other core locks is allocated at link time by multiplying the single core locks size with (PLATFORM_CORE_COUNT - 1). The normal memory lock algorithm now uses lock address instead of the `id` in the per_cpu_data. For locks allocated in coherent memory, it moves locks from tzfw_coherent_memory to bakery_lock section. The bakery locks are allocated as part of bss or in coherent memory depending on usage of coherent memory. Both these regions are initialised to zero as part of run_time_init before locks are used. Hence, bakery_lock_init() is made an empty function as the lock memory is already initialised to zero. The above design lead to the removal of psci bakery locks from non_cpu_power_pd_node to psci_locks. NOTE: THE BAKERY LOCK API WHEN USE_COHERENT_MEM IS NOT SET HAS CHANGED. THIS IS A BREAKING CHANGE FOR ALL PLATFORM PORTS THAT ALLOCATE BAKERY LOCKS IN NORMAL MEMORY. Change-Id: Ic3751c0066b8032dcbf9d88f1d4dc73d15f61d8b
2015-09-10 11:39:36 +01:00
/*******************************************************************************
* SPD's power management hooks registered with PSCI
******************************************************************************/
extern const spd_pm_ops_t *psci_spd_pm;
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/*******************************************************************************
* Function prototypes
******************************************************************************/
/* Private exported functions from psci_common.c */
int psci_validate_power_state(unsigned int power_state,
psci_power_state_t *state_info);
void psci_query_sys_suspend_pwrstate(psci_power_state_t *state_info);
int psci_validate_mpidr(u_register_t mpidr);
void psci_init_req_local_pwr_states(void);
void psci_get_target_local_pwr_states(unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
psci_power_state_t *target_state);
int psci_validate_entry_point(entry_point_info_t *ep,
uintptr_t entrypoint, u_register_t context_id);
void psci_get_parent_pwr_domain_nodes(unsigned int cpu_idx,
unsigned int end_lvl,
unsigned int node_index[]);
void psci_do_state_coordination(unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
psci_power_state_t *state_info);
void psci_acquire_pwr_domain_locks(unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
unsigned int cpu_idx);
void psci_release_pwr_domain_locks(unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
unsigned int cpu_idx);
int psci_validate_suspend_req(const psci_power_state_t *state_info,
unsigned int is_power_down_state);
unsigned int psci_find_max_off_lvl(const psci_power_state_t *state_info);
unsigned int psci_find_target_suspend_lvl(const psci_power_state_t *state_info);
void psci_set_pwr_domains_to_run(unsigned int end_pwrlvl);
void psci_print_power_domain_map(void);
unsigned int psci_is_last_on_cpu(void);
int psci_spd_migrate_info(u_register_t *mpidr);
PSCI: Optimize call paths if all participants are cache-coherent The current PSCI implementation can apply certain optimizations upon the assumption that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-up. - Skip performing cache maintenance during power-down: At present, on the power-down path, CPU driver disables caches and MMU, and performs cache maintenance in preparation for powering down the CPU. This means that PSCI must perform additional cache maintenance on the extant stack for correct functioning. If all participating CPUs are cache-coherent, CPU driver would neither disable MMU nor perform cache maintenance. The CPU being powered down, therefore, remain cache-coherent throughout all PSCI call paths. This in turn means that PSCI cache maintenance operations are not required during power down. - Choose spin locks instead of bakery locks: The current PSCI implementation must synchronize both cache-coherent and non-cache-coherent participants. Mutual exclusion primitives are not guaranteed to function on non-coherent memory. For this reason, the current PSCI implementation had to resort to bakery locks. If all participants are cache-coherent, the implementation can enable MMU and data caches early, and substitute bakery locks for spin locks. Spin locks make use of architectural mutual exclusion primitives, and are lighter and faster. The optimizations are applied when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY build option is enabled, as it's expected that all PSCI participants are cache-coherent in those systems. Change-Id: Iac51c3ed318ea7e2120f6b6a46fd2db2eae46ede Signed-off-by: Jeenu Viswambharan <jeenu.viswambharan@arm.com>
2017-01-05 11:01:02 +00:00
void psci_do_pwrdown_sequence(unsigned int power_level);
/*
* CPU power down is directly called only when HW_ASSISTED_COHERENCY is
* available. Otherwise, this needs post-call stack maintenance, which is
* handled in assembly.
*/
void prepare_cpu_pwr_dwn(unsigned int power_level);
/* Private exported functions from psci_on.c */
int psci_cpu_on_start(u_register_t target_cpu,
entry_point_info_t *ep);
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
void psci_cpu_on_finish(unsigned int cpu_idx,
psci_power_state_t *state_info);
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/* Private exported functions from psci_off.c */
int psci_do_cpu_off(unsigned int end_pwrlvl);
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/* Private exported functions from psci_suspend.c */
void psci_cpu_suspend_start(entry_point_info_t *ep,
unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
psci_power_state_t *state_info,
unsigned int is_power_down_state);
void psci_cpu_suspend_finish(unsigned int cpu_idx,
psci_power_state_t *state_info);
/* Private exported functions from psci_helpers.S */
void psci_do_pwrdown_cache_maintenance(unsigned int pwr_level);
void psci_do_pwrup_cache_maintenance(void);
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
/* Private exported functions from psci_system_off.c */
void __dead2 psci_system_off(void);
void __dead2 psci_system_reset(void);
int psci_system_reset2(uint32_t reset_type, u_register_t cookie);
/* Private exported functions from psci_stat.c */
void psci_stats_update_pwr_down(unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
const psci_power_state_t *state_info);
void psci_stats_update_pwr_up(unsigned int end_pwrlvl,
const psci_power_state_t *state_info);
u_register_t psci_stat_residency(u_register_t target_cpu,
unsigned int power_state);
u_register_t psci_stat_count(u_register_t target_cpu,
unsigned int power_state);
/* Private exported functions from psci_mem_protect.c */
int psci_mem_protect(unsigned int enable);
int psci_mem_chk_range(uintptr_t base, u_register_t length);
2013-10-25 09:08:21 +01:00
#endif /* __PSCI_PRIVATE_H__ */